what primordial rending reflects itself to itself in its own image - never so simple as the obvious answer, but neither is it different from it what we have named that which longs for its other half and what those names have come to mean, meaning always not only handed down from the past, but projected retroactively onto it there is surely no return except the necessity of through the necessity of the rending and of its naming and of the naming’s erosion in the ever-throughness of becoming
Discussion about this post
No posts